OAKMOREL Forensic Intelligence // [email protected]
35 U.S.C. § 328 35 u.s.c. · post-grant review · title 35
35 U.S.C. § 328
Decision of the Board
Title 35 USC
● ACTIVE
Ch. 32
Jurisdiction Federal — United States
Chapter POST-GRANT REVIEW
Primary Source uscode.house.gov ↗
Federation ID OM-USC35-SEC-E983B8
STATUTORY TEXT primary source · verbatim · uscode.house.gov

U.S.C. Title 35 - PATENTS 35 U.S.C. United States Code, 2023 Edition Title 35 - PATENTS PART III - PATENTS AND PROTECTION OF PATENT RIGHTS CHAPTER 32 - POST-GRANT REVIEW Sec. 328 - Decision of the Board From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov

§328. Decision of the Board

(a) Final Written Decision.—If a post-grant review is instituted and not dismissed under this chapter, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board shall issue a final written decision with respect to the patentability of any patent claim challenged by the petitioner and any new claim added under section 326(d). (b) Certificate.—If the Patent Trial and Appeal Board issues a final written decision under subsection (a) and the time for appeal has expired or any appeal has terminated, the Director shall issue and publish a certificate canceling any claim of the patent finally determined to be unpatentable, confirming any claim of the patent determined to be patentable, and incorporating in the patent by operation of the certificate any new or amended claim determined to be patentable. (c) Intervening Rights.—Any proposed amended or new claim determined to be patentable and incorporated into a patent following a post-grant review under this chapter shall have the same effect as that specified in section 252 for reissued patents on the right of any person who made, purchased, or used within the United States, or imported into the United States, anything patented by such proposed amended or new claim, or who made substantial preparation therefor, before the issuance of a certificate under subsection (b). (d) Data on Length of Review.—The Office shall make available to the public data describing the length of time between the institution of, and the issuance of a final written decision under subsection (a) for, each post-grant review.

(Added and amended Pub. L. 112–29, §§6(d), 20(j), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 310, 335.)

Editorial Notes

Amendments 2011—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 112–29, §20(j), struck out "of this title" after "252".

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2011 Amendment Amendment by section 20(j) of Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after that effective date, see section 20(l) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 2 of this title.

Effective Date Section effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable only to patents described in section 3(n)(1) of Pub. L. 112–29 (35 U.S.C. 100 note), with certain exceptions and limitations, see section 6(f)(2), (3) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 321 of this title.

Source: uscode.house.gov — public domain Official Source ↗
ROOT-LD ENTITY DATA machine-readable · federation graph · v1.0
Federation ID
OM-USC35-SEC-E983B8
Entity Class
STATUTE / FEDERAL-CODE-SECTION
Domain Signature
oakmorel.com
Spec Version
Root-LD v1.0
Source
PRIMARY-SOURCE
Content Hash
980bb07b0b7336ff...
Source Verified
✓ TRUE
Semantic Edges
PENDING — corpus passes queued
The statutory text of 35 U.S.C. § 328 is reproduced from the official United States Code as published by the Office of the Law Revision Counsel of the U.S. House of Representatives (uscode.house.gov).
OakMorel Law
35 U.S.C.
Citation
35 U.S.C. § 328
Status
● ACTIVE
Chapter
32 — POST-GRANT REVIEW
Title
Patents
Jurisdiction
Federal
Federation ID
OM-USC35-SEC-E983B8
Root-LD Spec
v1.0
► Forensic Services
Procurement fraud, platform integrity, litigation support. First conversation free.
► CONTACT OAKMOREL →
↑↓ Scroll ENTER Select ESC Exit
Patents — 35 U.S.C. § 328