OAKMOREL Forensic Intelligence // [email protected]
28 U.S.C. § 2349 28 u.s.c. · orders of debtor rehabilitation courts · title 28
28 U.S.C. § 2349
Jurisdiction of the proceeding
Title 28 USC
● ACTIVE
Ch. 158
Jurisdiction Federal — United States
Chapter Orders of Debtor Rehabilitation Courts
Primary Source uscode.house.gov ↗
Federation ID OM-USC28-SEC-8CE8D7
STATUTORY TEXT primary source · verbatim · uscode.house.gov

U.S.C. Title 28 - JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE 28 U.S.C. United States Code, 2023 Edition Title 28 - JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE PART VI - PARTICULAR PROCEEDINGS CHAPTER 158 - ORDERS OF FEDERAL AGENCIES; REVIEW Sec. 2349 - Jurisdiction of the proceeding From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov

§2349. Jurisdiction of the proceeding

(a) The court of appeals has jurisdiction of the proceeding on the filing and service of a petition to review. The court of appeals in which the record on review is filed, on the filing, has jurisdiction to vacate stay orders or interlocutory injunctions previously granted by any court, and has exclusive jurisdiction to make and enter, on the petition, evidence, and proceedings set forth in the record on review, a judgment determining the validity of, and enjoining, setting aside, or suspending, in whole or in part, the order of the agency. (b) The filing of the petition to review does not of itself stay or suspend the operation of the order of the agency, but the court of appeals in its discretion may restrain or suspend, in whole or in part, the operation of the order pending the final hearing and determination of the petition. When the petitioner makes application for an interlocutory injunction restraining or suspending the enforcement, operation, or execution of, or setting aside, in whole or in part, any order reviewable under this chapter, at least 5 days' notice of the hearing thereon shall be given to the agency and to the Attorney General. In a case in which irreparable damage would otherwise result to the petitioner, the court of appeals may, on hearing, after reasonable notice to the agency and to the Attorney General, order a temporary stay or suspension, in whole or in part, of the operation of the order of the agency for not more than 60 days from the date of the order pending the hearing on the application for the interlocutory injunction, in which case the order of the court of appeals shall contain a specific finding, based on evidence submitted to the court of appeals, and identified by reference thereto, that irreparable damage would result to the petitioner and specifying the nature of the damage. The court of appeals, at the time of hearing the application for an interlocutory injunction, on a like finding, may continue the temporary stay or suspension, in whole or in part, until decision on the application.

(Added Pub. L. 89–554, §4(e), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 624; amended Pub. L. 98–620, title IV, §402(29)(F), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3359.)

Historical and Revision Notes DerivationU.S. CodeRevised Statutes and Statutes at Large

5 U.S.C. 1039. Dec. 29, 1950, ch. 1189, §9, 64 Stat. 1131.

Sept. 13, 1961, Pub. L. 87–225, §1, 75 Stat. 497.

The headnotes of the subsections are omitted as unnecessary and to conform to the style of title 28. In subsection (a), the words "has jurisdiction" and "has exclusive jurisdiction" are substituted for "shall have jurisdiction" and "shall have exclusive jurisdiction", respectively. The words "previously granted" are substituted for "theretofore granted" as the preferred expression. In subsection (b), the words "does not" are substituted for "shall not". The words "of the United States" following "Attorney General" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "In a case in which" are substituted for "In cases where". The word "result" is substituted for "ensue". In the fourth sentence, the words "provided for above" following the last word "application" are omitted as unnecessary. In the last sentence, the word "applies" is substituted for "shall apply".

Editorial Notes

Amendments 1984—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 98–620 struck out provisions that the hearing on an application for an interlocutory injunction be given preference and expedited and heard at the earliest practicable date after the expiration of the notice of hearing on the application, and that on the final hearing of any proceeding to review any order under this chapter, the same requirements as to precedence and expedition was to apply.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1984 Amendment Amendment by Pub. L. 98–620 not applicable to cases pending on Nov. 8, 1984, see section 403 of Pub. L. 98–620 set out as an Effective Date note under section 1657 of this title.

Source: uscode.house.gov — public domain Official Source ↗
ROOT-LD ENTITY DATA machine-readable · federation graph · v1.0
Federation ID
OM-USC28-SEC-8CE8D7
Entity Class
STATUTE / FEDERAL-CODE-SECTION
Domain Signature
oakmorel.com
Spec Version
Root-LD v1.0
Source
API-FETCH
Content Hash
6d7ab7dca67bb84d...
Source Verified
✓ TRUE
Semantic Edges
PENDING — corpus passes queued
This page was generated from primary source data retrieved via the GovInfo API (api.govinfo.gov). The statutory text of 28 U.S.C. § 2349 is reproduced from the official United States Code as published by the Office of the Law Revision Counsel.
OakMorel Law
28 U.S.C.
Citation
28 U.S.C. § 2349
Status
● ACTIVE
Chapter
158 — Orders of Debtor Rehabilitation Courts
Title
Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Jurisdiction
Federal
Federation ID
OM-USC28-SEC-8CE8D7
Root-LD Spec
v1.0
► Forensic Services
Procurement fraud, platform integrity, litigation support. First conversation free.
► CONTACT OAKMOREL →
↑↓ Scroll ENTER Select ESC Exit
Judiciary and Judicial Procedure — 28 U.S.C. § 2349